Skip to content
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size default color grey color red color blue color

My Mosaic Review | Your resource for photo mosaic design

Home arrow Mosaic 101
Mosaic 101: Quick and Dirty Mosaic Pitfalls PDF Print E-mail
Written by Melissa   
Monday, 12 January 2009

If you are new to photo mosaics or just simply enjoy looking at them then this article is for you…
I wanted to share a few quick thoughts. I am making the assumption that if you are reading this you have seen a few photo mosaics (in person, on the web, or on TV) and that you know that a photo mosaic is a group of photos (photo tiles or cells) arranged in a certain way to assemble another larger image. However I have found that much can go wrong in this effort if the colors and shapes of the photo tiles/cells are not analyzed correctly. To correct these short falls, some software applications and services “cheat” or create fake mosaics by using one of the two unfortunate methods below.

  1. Superimposing & Over-colorization: This "cheating" method is where the target source is placed (or ghosted) on top of the so called “photo mosaic”. This creates a mosaic that looks like a double exposure, which unfortunately makes the cell photos difficult to see (and to be honest is a cheap Photoshop effect). Another similar unfortunate method is over-colorization; this is where cell photos are colorized to the point where they are so faded they are difficult to see. For examples of this superimposing & over-colorization, please see the mosaics below or visit the side-by-side comparison page.

  2. Ultra tiny photo tiles/cells: Although this may or may not be considered “cheating” it can definitely detract from the overall mosaic experience and wow factor. The smaller you make the cells, the easier it will be to create the target source image – to drive home this concept, simply imagine making the cell photos so small that they were the size of a single pixel, ie, making the mosaic simply a pixelated photo. In other words, what is the point of a photo mosaic if the cell photos are too tiny to easily see? This in a sense is what happens when software or services simply lack the matching algorithms to keep the cell photos as large as possible by using a combination of cell photos together to form part of the larger target source. For examples of ultra tiny photo tiles/cells, please see the mosaics below or visit the side-by side comparison page.

 
Avoiding the above two methods can truly help make for an amazing photo mosaic!

To help clarify futher...
Below are three mosaics, the first mosaic (in green), which does not use any of the "cheating" methods described above. The second and third mosaic (in red), display the "cheating" methods described above.

True mosaic
(ex. service: Picture Mosaics)
Good photo mosaic
|
Photo mosaic box1 (true)
|
Photo mosaic box2 (true)
|
Photo mosaic box3 (true)

We found Picture Mosaics the only service to offer this type of "true" mosaic.


Mosaic using superimposing or ghosting
(ex. sevices: DesignAMosaic, Mosaically)
photo mosaic with superimposing/ghosting
|
Photo mosaic box1 (superimposed)
|
Photo mosaic box2 (superimposed)
|
Photo mosaic box3 (superimposed)

We found that DesignAMosaic, Mosaically, and a few other companies most often used this method.

Mosaic using small cells
(ex. service: Big Mosaics)
Photo mosaic using small cells
|
Photo mosaic box1 (small cells)
|
Photo mosaic (small cells)
|
Photo mosaic box3 (small cells)

We found that Big Mosaics most often used this method.


* Please note that the above mosaics are for illustrative purposes only created by me to show some the "cheating" methods used by some companies and software. To see the mosaics really created by companies listed above, please visit the side-by side comparison page.


Last Updated ( Wednesday, 29 July 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register